Showing posts with label News and Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label News and Reviews. Show all posts
Monday, November 15, 2010
SanDisk 8GB microSDHC (SDSDQ-8192) Memory Card w/Adapter (Bulk Package) Black Friday bargains 2010
* SanDisk 8 GB microSDHC Card General Features: 8 GB capacity microSDHC (High capacity) flash card
* Speed performance rating: Class 2
* Built to last, with an operating shock rating of 2,000G’s, equivalent to a ten foot drop
* Compact and portable
High Capacity Flash Memory Card! This SanDisk microSDHC (High Capacity) flash card stores up to 8 gigs of your favorite music, photos, videos and documents and is designed for use with mobile phones and other compatible microSDHC devices! It provides a Class 2 speed performance rating and is built to last, with an operating shock rating of 2,000G’s, equivalent to a ten foot drop!
Silicon Power SDHC Class 10 32GB Memory Card
Author: Chris Ramseyer
Introduction
We all have products that use the Secure Digital Cards. SD has been adapted by nearly all consumer product makers in one form or another. Which form is another story entirely, as there are so many and within each category there are speed ratings. Some devices need to be able to operate above a certain speed to be able to handle the tasks given. This is where the class structure comes in.
Most storage products are rated at a maximum speed, the highest peak performance possible under ideal conditions. This works out well when everything you are doing is well within specifications, but there can be times when a minimum speed is required. SD products are rated at a minimum speed, the Speed Card Rating. A Class 2 SD card can write at least 2MB/s, a Class 4 SD card can write at least 4MB/s and so on. Devices like HD video recorders require a minimum sustained write throughput. If your device needs to be able to write at 6MB/s but can only write at 4MB/s, then your video will suffer from dropped frames, lost audio or be completely corrupted. Currently Class 10 is the fastest available on the market and it has a minimum speed of 10MB/s.
Today we are looking at the Silicon Power SDHC Class 10 with 32GB of capacity. This capacity size makes it perfect for photographers or those looking to record high definition video. Let’s take a look at the specs first up.
I have to admit I really like the new class standard that measures the minimum performance and glad they got off of the ‘x’ standard. Silicon Power has released their new Class 10 SDHC cards in four capacities; 4, 8, 16 and 32GB. To go larger in this format you have to look towards SDXC (eXtended Capacity) standard.
Silicon Power isn’t in the US market as heavily as it once was. We were only able to find one US seller of the Silicon Power SDHC Class 10 32GB and it was a specialty shop catering to professional users. All Pro Sound lists the 32GB model like we are reviewing today for 134.99 USD. They also list the rest of the Class 10 SDHC cards; 4GB (17.49), 8GB (32.34) and 16GB (58.06).
I really wish Silicon Power would import more of their products to the US since they are well made and it would bring the costs down. In relation, we went shopping at Newegg and found other 32GB SCHD Class 10 cards for as low as 59.99.
It should also be noted that Silicon Power offers a lifetime warranty with their SDHC products.
Introduction
We all have products that use the Secure Digital Cards. SD has been adapted by nearly all consumer product makers in one form or another. Which form is another story entirely, as there are so many and within each category there are speed ratings. Some devices need to be able to operate above a certain speed to be able to handle the tasks given. This is where the class structure comes in.
Most storage products are rated at a maximum speed, the highest peak performance possible under ideal conditions. This works out well when everything you are doing is well within specifications, but there can be times when a minimum speed is required. SD products are rated at a minimum speed, the Speed Card Rating. A Class 2 SD card can write at least 2MB/s, a Class 4 SD card can write at least 4MB/s and so on. Devices like HD video recorders require a minimum sustained write throughput. If your device needs to be able to write at 6MB/s but can only write at 4MB/s, then your video will suffer from dropped frames, lost audio or be completely corrupted. Currently Class 10 is the fastest available on the market and it has a minimum speed of 10MB/s.
Today we are looking at the Silicon Power SDHC Class 10 with 32GB of capacity. This capacity size makes it perfect for photographers or those looking to record high definition video. Let’s take a look at the specs first up.
I have to admit I really like the new class standard that measures the minimum performance and glad they got off of the ‘x’ standard. Silicon Power has released their new Class 10 SDHC cards in four capacities; 4, 8, 16 and 32GB. To go larger in this format you have to look towards SDXC (eXtended Capacity) standard.
Silicon Power isn’t in the US market as heavily as it once was. We were only able to find one US seller of the Silicon Power SDHC Class 10 32GB and it was a specialty shop catering to professional users. All Pro Sound lists the 32GB model like we are reviewing today for 134.99 USD. They also list the rest of the Class 10 SDHC cards; 4GB (17.49), 8GB (32.34) and 16GB (58.06).
I really wish Silicon Power would import more of their products to the US since they are well made and it would bring the costs down. In relation, we went shopping at Newegg and found other 32GB SCHD Class 10 cards for as low as 59.99.
It should also be noted that Silicon Power offers a lifetime warranty with their SDHC products.
SD card upgrades brick Windows Phone 7 handsets
By Stewart Mitchell
Posted on 15 Nov 2010 at 11:20
Microsoft Phone 7 users have been warned not to upgrade handset memory or use the phone’s SD card in other devices, after it emerged that the handsets alter the memory card’s format.
According to Microsoft, removing the original SD cards can cause data loss and stop the handset from working properly, limiting upgrade options that might have been a key purchasing motivation for media hoarders.
“You should not remove the SD card in your phone or add a new one because your Windows Phone 7 device might not work properly,” Microsoft said on its support site.
“Existing data on the phone will be lost, and the SD card in your phone can't be used in other Windows Phones, PCs, or other devices.”
The company said that when an SD card is integrated with the operating system, Windows Phone 7 reformats the memory card, and creates a single file system that spans the internal storage and the card, locking it to the phone with an automatically generated key.
Because of this, handset memory was never intended to be end-user expandable in Windows Phone 7, stating that the SD card slot was intended for use only by manufacturers and mobile operators.
To reinforce this position, Microsoft said it would disable handsets when consumers removed pre-installed SD cards.
“If you remove an SD card that has already been integrated with the phone, the phone displays an error message that tells you to reinsert the SD card,” the company said.
“All phone functionality is disabled except for the ability to make emergency calls. The phone will function normally again only if you reinsert the original SD card and then start the phone.”
Users can, according to Microsoft, only insert a new SD card before the handset is first turned on or by restoring the handset to factory settings, which would cause data loss.
Microsoft warned that even if a phone appeared to be working properly after the upgrade, problems could arise once the internal memory had filled up.
“In some cases, these performance issues might only be evident after using the phone for some time,” Micorosft support said.
“For example, if your phone has 8GB of internal memory and you integrate a non-compliant SD card with the phone, you might notice the performance issues only after the 8GB of internal memory is filled with applications and media.”
Read more: SD card upgrades brick Windows Phone 7 handsets | News | PC Pro http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/362788/sd-card-upgrades-brick-windows-phone-7-handsets#ixzz15Q1K9rYn
Posted on 15 Nov 2010 at 11:20
Microsoft Phone 7 users have been warned not to upgrade handset memory or use the phone’s SD card in other devices, after it emerged that the handsets alter the memory card’s format.
According to Microsoft, removing the original SD cards can cause data loss and stop the handset from working properly, limiting upgrade options that might have been a key purchasing motivation for media hoarders.
“You should not remove the SD card in your phone or add a new one because your Windows Phone 7 device might not work properly,” Microsoft said on its support site.
“Existing data on the phone will be lost, and the SD card in your phone can't be used in other Windows Phones, PCs, or other devices.”
The company said that when an SD card is integrated with the operating system, Windows Phone 7 reformats the memory card, and creates a single file system that spans the internal storage and the card, locking it to the phone with an automatically generated key.
Because of this, handset memory was never intended to be end-user expandable in Windows Phone 7, stating that the SD card slot was intended for use only by manufacturers and mobile operators.
To reinforce this position, Microsoft said it would disable handsets when consumers removed pre-installed SD cards.
“If you remove an SD card that has already been integrated with the phone, the phone displays an error message that tells you to reinsert the SD card,” the company said.
“All phone functionality is disabled except for the ability to make emergency calls. The phone will function normally again only if you reinsert the original SD card and then start the phone.”
Users can, according to Microsoft, only insert a new SD card before the handset is first turned on or by restoring the handset to factory settings, which would cause data loss.
Microsoft warned that even if a phone appeared to be working properly after the upgrade, problems could arise once the internal memory had filled up.
“In some cases, these performance issues might only be evident after using the phone for some time,” Micorosft support said.
“For example, if your phone has 8GB of internal memory and you integrate a non-compliant SD card with the phone, you might notice the performance issues only after the 8GB of internal memory is filled with applications and media.”
Read more: SD card upgrades brick Windows Phone 7 handsets | News | PC Pro http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/362788/sd-card-upgrades-brick-windows-phone-7-handsets#ixzz15Q1K9rYn
OCZ Blade ST 2000MHz Low Voltage DDR3 Memory
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Memory
Written by Steven Iglesias-Hearst
Thursday, 11 November 2010
Low Voltage DDR3 Final Thoughts
To summarize, increasing RAM speed will have more of an effect than tightening your timings but the two are very close. When overclocked in line with your CPU then you will get even better results. If you are solely playing games on your PC you will be just as well with a 1333MHz kit as you would with a 2000MHz kit as your GPU is your best tool here. The whole point of high speed memory kits is to allow you to increase your CPU speed higher without having to worry about RAM instability. My max stable overclock had a negative effect due to keeping the CPU as close to stock speed as possible during testing meant it was running slower in this configuration than all other configurations. At 1333MHz the CPU was 133x21 (2.79GHz), at 1600MHz the CPU was 160x18 (2.88GHz), at 2000MHz the CPU was 200x14 (2.80GHz) and finally at 2090MHz the cpu was 209x13 (2.71GHz).
The OCZ Blade ST 2000MHz 4GB kit would possibly be best suited to an i7 series 1156 CPU or one of the 'K' series unlocked 1156 CPU's in my opinion, this is because they have the option of a 2:12 RAM multiplier with their IMC which gives more flexibility and tweaking potential when overclocking either the CPU or the RAM. The i3/i5 CPU's can easily run 2000MHz with a 2:10 multi but there isn't much room left to overclock.
The OCZ Blade ST 2000MHz 4GB kit wasn't the easiest RAM kit to work with, firstly the SPD table looked as if it was designed for Intel Core 2 CPU's instead of the specified Intel 1156 Core i3/i5/i7 CPU's that OCZ advertise on their website, and second there were no CL9 timings or 1.65v voltage settings to select which made setting up this RAM all that more difficult. Most people that buy RAM expect it to run at its rated speed or at least have a profile to select from, those people would more likely return this kit as faulty and cause unnecessary RMA's.
OCZ Blade ST Memory Conclusion
In this section I am going to write a brief five point summary on the following categories; Performance, Appearance, Construction, Functionality and Value. These views are my own and help me to give the OCZ Blade ST 2000MHz Low Voltage 4GB Kit a rating out of 10. A high or low score does not necessarily mean that it is better or worse than a similar RAM kit which has been reviewed by another writer here at Benchmark Reviews, which may have got a higher or lower score. It is however a good indicator of whether the RAM kit is good or not. I would strongly urge you to read the entire review, if you have not already, so that you can make an educated decision for yourself.
The OCZ Blade ST 2000MHz 4GB kit performed very well at lower speeds of 1333MHz and 1600MHz where we were able to lower the voltage to 1.50v and tighten the timings to CL6 and CL7 respectively. Overclocking was hindered somewhat by the IMC on my Core i5 760 CPU as it has a max 2:10 multiplier; this meant that the overclock was dependant on the BCLK. There were no memory errors at 212 BCLK but the CPU was not stable enough to bench with. My max stable overclock of 2090MHz had a negative effect as the CPU was running a little slower than it was at all other configurations tested.
Appearance is subjective and is different to all individuals, due to the graphical nature of our reviews you can easily make up your own mind on what you think. I really like the look, the design is different than other tall heatspreaders. The brushed aluminum is a very nice look indeed and the render and color scheme on the sticker makes this kit stand out. I'm not overly keen on the green PCB but most of it is hidden out of sight by the DIMM slot and catches anyway. The only real blemish on these modules is where the sticker covers the screws and you get little bubbles, but that's just me being picky.
Construction is second to none, period. The heatspreaders are very well attached and are made of some heavyweight aluminum, they feel double the weight of my previous G.Skill RipJaws kit which gives me the sense of strength and build quality that I expect from a premium product.
Functionality is where this kit lets us down, Firstly the SPD table doesn't relate to the product and secondly there are no CL9 timings or settings with 1.65v to choose from which makes things in the BIOS more tricky than they need to be. Honestly OCZ need to take a look at the JEDEC's in the SPD table before they get too many returns due to users not being able to run this kit at its rated speed, sort this little problem out and you will have a winner. If you can and don't mind tweaking you will find this RAM kit will be quite rewarding.
The OCZ Blade ST Low Voltage 4GB kit (P/N OCZ3BST2000LV4GK) has an MSRP of $106.99 at the time of writing this article, this is good value for money and outweighs many issues that may have been raised in the previous sections of this conclusion. For this price you won't get much better I don't think, if you have the know-how and you don't mind spending some time tweaking then I would definitely recommend this kit to you. If you are just a beginner in the overclocking scene you should look past this kit and go for something simpler, unless you fancy a challenge.
Pros: bmr_approved.png
+ Very nice looks
+ Build quality is excellent
+ Very flexible at lower speeds
+ 1T Command Rate at all speeds
+ Limited lifetime warranty and free technical support
+ Great value for money
+ Opens up more CPU overclocking potential
Cons:
- SPD table lacks any worthwhile settings
- No settings for rated speed (CL or voltage)
- Very tall, could possibly interfere with bigger CPU coolers
- No good for beginners
Ratings:
* Performance: 9.00
* Appearance: 9.00
* Construction: 9.50
* Functionality: 6.00
* Value: 9.50
Final Score: 8.60 out of 10.
Written by Steven Iglesias-Hearst
Thursday, 11 November 2010
Low Voltage DDR3 Final Thoughts
To summarize, increasing RAM speed will have more of an effect than tightening your timings but the two are very close. When overclocked in line with your CPU then you will get even better results. If you are solely playing games on your PC you will be just as well with a 1333MHz kit as you would with a 2000MHz kit as your GPU is your best tool here. The whole point of high speed memory kits is to allow you to increase your CPU speed higher without having to worry about RAM instability. My max stable overclock had a negative effect due to keeping the CPU as close to stock speed as possible during testing meant it was running slower in this configuration than all other configurations. At 1333MHz the CPU was 133x21 (2.79GHz), at 1600MHz the CPU was 160x18 (2.88GHz), at 2000MHz the CPU was 200x14 (2.80GHz) and finally at 2090MHz the cpu was 209x13 (2.71GHz).
The OCZ Blade ST 2000MHz 4GB kit would possibly be best suited to an i7 series 1156 CPU or one of the 'K' series unlocked 1156 CPU's in my opinion, this is because they have the option of a 2:12 RAM multiplier with their IMC which gives more flexibility and tweaking potential when overclocking either the CPU or the RAM. The i3/i5 CPU's can easily run 2000MHz with a 2:10 multi but there isn't much room left to overclock.
The OCZ Blade ST 2000MHz 4GB kit wasn't the easiest RAM kit to work with, firstly the SPD table looked as if it was designed for Intel Core 2 CPU's instead of the specified Intel 1156 Core i3/i5/i7 CPU's that OCZ advertise on their website, and second there were no CL9 timings or 1.65v voltage settings to select which made setting up this RAM all that more difficult. Most people that buy RAM expect it to run at its rated speed or at least have a profile to select from, those people would more likely return this kit as faulty and cause unnecessary RMA's.
OCZ Blade ST Memory Conclusion
In this section I am going to write a brief five point summary on the following categories; Performance, Appearance, Construction, Functionality and Value. These views are my own and help me to give the OCZ Blade ST 2000MHz Low Voltage 4GB Kit a rating out of 10. A high or low score does not necessarily mean that it is better or worse than a similar RAM kit which has been reviewed by another writer here at Benchmark Reviews, which may have got a higher or lower score. It is however a good indicator of whether the RAM kit is good or not. I would strongly urge you to read the entire review, if you have not already, so that you can make an educated decision for yourself.
The OCZ Blade ST 2000MHz 4GB kit performed very well at lower speeds of 1333MHz and 1600MHz where we were able to lower the voltage to 1.50v and tighten the timings to CL6 and CL7 respectively. Overclocking was hindered somewhat by the IMC on my Core i5 760 CPU as it has a max 2:10 multiplier; this meant that the overclock was dependant on the BCLK. There were no memory errors at 212 BCLK but the CPU was not stable enough to bench with. My max stable overclock of 2090MHz had a negative effect as the CPU was running a little slower than it was at all other configurations tested.
Appearance is subjective and is different to all individuals, due to the graphical nature of our reviews you can easily make up your own mind on what you think. I really like the look, the design is different than other tall heatspreaders. The brushed aluminum is a very nice look indeed and the render and color scheme on the sticker makes this kit stand out. I'm not overly keen on the green PCB but most of it is hidden out of sight by the DIMM slot and catches anyway. The only real blemish on these modules is where the sticker covers the screws and you get little bubbles, but that's just me being picky.
Construction is second to none, period. The heatspreaders are very well attached and are made of some heavyweight aluminum, they feel double the weight of my previous G.Skill RipJaws kit which gives me the sense of strength and build quality that I expect from a premium product.
Functionality is where this kit lets us down, Firstly the SPD table doesn't relate to the product and secondly there are no CL9 timings or settings with 1.65v to choose from which makes things in the BIOS more tricky than they need to be. Honestly OCZ need to take a look at the JEDEC's in the SPD table before they get too many returns due to users not being able to run this kit at its rated speed, sort this little problem out and you will have a winner. If you can and don't mind tweaking you will find this RAM kit will be quite rewarding.
The OCZ Blade ST Low Voltage 4GB kit (P/N OCZ3BST2000LV4GK) has an MSRP of $106.99 at the time of writing this article, this is good value for money and outweighs many issues that may have been raised in the previous sections of this conclusion. For this price you won't get much better I don't think, if you have the know-how and you don't mind spending some time tweaking then I would definitely recommend this kit to you. If you are just a beginner in the overclocking scene you should look past this kit and go for something simpler, unless you fancy a challenge.
Pros: bmr_approved.png
+ Very nice looks
+ Build quality is excellent
+ Very flexible at lower speeds
+ 1T Command Rate at all speeds
+ Limited lifetime warranty and free technical support
+ Great value for money
+ Opens up more CPU overclocking potential
Cons:
- SPD table lacks any worthwhile settings
- No settings for rated speed (CL or voltage)
- Very tall, could possibly interfere with bigger CPU coolers
- No good for beginners
Ratings:
* Performance: 9.00
* Appearance: 9.00
* Construction: 9.50
* Functionality: 6.00
* Value: 9.50
Final Score: 8.60 out of 10.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)